Understanding Customer Needs and Innovation Using Business Process Techniques

Harvard Business School professor and leading management thinker Clayton Christensen has popularised and applied the concept of “jobs-to-be-done” to uncover customer needs and identify innovation opportunities. He has applied this idea to fields as diverse as education, healthcare, and self-help. The concept is that people “hire” products and services to get a job done. Office workers hire word-processing software to create documents and digital recorders to capture meeting notes. Surgeons hire scalpels to dissect soft tissue and electrocautery devices to control patient bleeding. Farmers hire herbicides to prevent weeds from impacting crop yields.

This approach might sound obvious, but there is seldom a systematic way to determine exactly how customers get a job done, so that innovation, even disruptive innovation, can be used to help people and companies get the job done in the quickest, most efficient way possible.

Lance Bettencourt and Anthony W. Ulwick, in their groundbreaking article, “The Customer-Centered Innovation Map,” Harvard Business Review, May 2008, propose an efficient yet simple system companies can use to find new ways to innovate. This approach is called job mapping. The technique breaks the customer’s job into a series of discrete process steps. By deconstructing a job from beginning to end, a company gains a complete view of all the points at which a customer might desire more help from a product or service—namely, at each step in the job. With a job map in hand, a company can analyze the biggest drawbacks of the products and services customers currently use.

To put these ideas into practice, the job must be defined as a process, a set of activities that consists of a series of steps that customers take to complete a task or achieve a goal or objective. This means the job to be done can be clearly documented to solve customer problems and enhance their experience.

Job mapping differs from as-is process mapping in that it focuses on what customers are trying to accomplish at each step, not what they are currently doing. For example, when an anesthesiologist checks a monitor during a surgical procedure, the action taken is just a means to an end. Detecting a change in a patient’s vital signs is the job the anesthesiologist is trying to accomplish.

By mapping every task in the job and identifying opportunities for innovative solutions, companies can discover new ways to differentiate their offerings. The job map is essentially a customer-centric process model that can be developed using process modeling techniques. Once the tasks are identified, a company can create value in several ways—by improving the execution of specific job steps; eliminating the need for particular inputs or outputs; removing an entire step from the responsibility of the customer; addressing an overlooked step; resequencing the steps; or enabling steps to be completed in new locations or at different times.

Bettencourt and Ulwick propose a universal structure for a job-to-be-done, regardless of the customer. This structure includes the following process activities: define the job requirements; identify and locate required inputs; prepare the components and the physical environment; confirm that everything is ready; execute the task; monitor the results and the environment; make modifications; and conclude the job. Because problems can occur at many points in the process, nearly all jobs also require a problem resolution step. Some steps are more critical than others, depending on the job, but each is necessary to get the job done successfully.

Business process analysis and process modeling can contribute significantly to understanding the job to be done and the innovation required to maximize customer satisfaction.

Learn to map and model customer-centric business processes by attending our Business Process Mapping and Modelling Course.

I am a senior consultant at Viewpoint, and I specialize in Business Process Management; Business Process Management, Requirements Engineering and Operations Management. I have also written multiple courses in my areas of specialisation.